If we have to change the name I'd vote for string_annotations -- "lazy" has too many other connotations (e.g. it might cause people to think it's the thunks). I find str_annotations too abbreviated, and stringify_annotations is too hard to spell.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2017, at 23:57, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Putting that quibble first: could we adjust the feature flag to be > > either "from __future__ import lazy_annotations" or "from __future__ > > import str_annotations"? > > > > Every time I see "from __future__ import annotations" I think "But > > we've had annotations since 3.0, why would they need a future > > import?". > > +1 for lazy_annotations for the same reason. > > -Barry > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido% > 40python.org > > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
