On 28 November 2017 at 15:42, Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: > On 11/27/2017 03:58 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote: >> We can't say anything about the order if someone passes a partial >> object > > Sure we could. We could ensure that functools.partial behaves in a sane > way, then document and guarantee that behavior.
Right, I think the main implication here would be that we need to ensure that any signature manipulation operations *we* provide are order preserving. Fortunately for Larry, we kinda cheat on that front: all the logic for dealing with this problem is in the inspect module itself, which knows about all the different ways we manipulate signatures in the standard library. That means that if we want to declare that the inspect module will be order preserving, we can, and it shouldn't require changes to anything else. Cheers, Nick. P.S. Note that inspect.getfullargspec() was actually undeprecated a while back - enough folks that didn't need access to the function annotations were reimplementing it for themselves "because the standard library API is deprecated" that the most logical course of action was to just declare it as being supported again. I don't think that changes the argument here though - it just means guaranteed order preservation in that API will only happen if we declare dicts to be insertion ordered in general. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
