Chris Barker writes: > are we only talking about __repr__ here ???
I am, because I haven't thought about the other methods, except to note I find it hard to imagine a use case *for me* that would require any of them. That sorta disqualifies me from comment. ;-) I assumed others were talking about all of the dataclass autogenerated methods, though. > And the fact that you can optionally tell it not to in some particular case > keeps full flexibility. AFAICS there is no question about that, just about *how* you indicate that you do or don't want autobogotification. > Will you get the "right" __repr__ now if you derive a datacalss from a > dataclass? That would be a nice feature. I hadn't thought about that: I wouldn't call it "nice", I'd say it's a sine-qua-back-to-the-drawing-board. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
