On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 4:34 PM Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 02:23:19PM +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:54:33 +0100 > > Christian Heimes <christ...@python.org> wrote: > > > > > > If we agree to drop support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.1, then I can > land > > > bunch of useful goodies like proper hostname verification [2], proper > > > fix for IP address in SNI TLS header [3], PEP 543 compatible > Certificate > > > and PrivateKey types (support loading certs and keys from file and > > > memory) [4], and simplified cipher suite configuration [5]. I can > > > finally clean up _ssl.c during the beta phase, too. > > > > Given the annoyance of supporting old OpenSSL versions, I'd say +1 to > > this. > > > > We'll have to deal with the complaints of users of Debian oldstable, > > CentOS 6 and RHEL 6, though. > > It will probably be more work for Christian, but is it reasonable to > keep support for the older versions of OpenSSL, but make the useful > goodies conditional on a newer version? > I don't think it is worth spending our limited engineering time supporting an unsupported library version. Leave that burden to stale distro maintainers who continue to choose dangerously stale software versions if they ironically want to use something as modern as 3.7 on top of an ancient set of libraries. +1 from me for requiring OpenSSL >= 1.0.2 in Python 3.7. -gps
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
