On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Chris Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Joni Orponen <j.orpo...@4teamwork.ch> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < >> chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: >> >>> And maybe we could even get rid of the "Framework" builds...... >>>> >>> >>> Please do not. These make life easier for doing things the Apple way for >>> signed sandboxed applications. >>> >>> For the record, are you re-distributing the python.org builds, or >>> re-building yourself? >>> >> >> We are re-building ourselves. >> > > Then it makes no difference to you if the pyton.org binaries are > Framework builds... though maybe you want the configure target available. > And if the official distribution distributes a Framework, the configure target and build for that are also actually maintained, which will keep them likelier usable. Would we not be doing a couple of very specific things, we'd be able to use the distributed Framework as well. It is not unconceivable we could use it as-is in the future or for other projects. -- Joni Orponen
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
