On 08/18/2014 04:23 PM, Robert Kuska wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Nick Coghlan" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 7:57:21 AM >> Subject: Re: Python 2.7 SSL upgrade patch available for testing >> >> On 08/07/2014 06:10 PM, Robert Kuska wrote: >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Nick Coghlan" <[email protected]> >>>> On 07/30/2014 12:16 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: >>>>> So the question is, are we feeling lucky? :) I'd say yes, since rawhide >>>>> has >>>>> just recently become future Fedora 22 and not much is going on in there >>>>> right now. If we break something, we can just revert it quickly and >>>>> everything will be fine. >>>>> >>>>> Is someone strictly against this or shall I move on with patching our >>>>> rawhide Python? >>>> >>>> Patching rawhide would be wonderful. The patch is at last passing >>>> Python's own test suite, so it shouldn't have broken anything too >>>> dramatically. >>> >>> I am willing to work on this starting next week (atm I am at flock), >>> I will test it along with some ssl dependent packages. >> >> Did anyone get a chance to try this out? > > Hi Nick, > > sorry for the delay. > > I did apply the patch, I have encountered seg fault in unicodeobject.c. > Right now I am checking for diffs in upstream 2.7 branch between our > unicodeobject.c and theirs. > > After that I will update the upstream bug report.
Thanks! The Windows and Mac OS X side of things are still going to qualify as "interesting" regardless, but we should be able to address a lot of the stability concerns on the Linux side... once we work out what it breaks :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan Red Hat Hosted & Shared Services Software Engineering & Development, Brisbane HSS Provisioning Architect _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
