>>>>> "NC" == Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> writes:
NC> I agree it doesn't make sense to include that information in the NC> Python packaging guidelines, but I think it does make sense to NC> provide such recommendations *somewhere*. I obviously agree, given that I wrote that I would try and draft something. Just haven't had much time yet. NC> Along those lines, it would potentially be useful to have a Python NC> specific packaging *tutorial* on the wiki an an alternative to the NC> generic https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package NC> that assumes folks will be doing everything by hand. That's certainly not a bad idea. It's a wiki; feel free to run with it. NC> For Python, it would make more sense to start with a tool like NC> Slavek's pyp2rpm to generate the initial SPEC file: NC> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyp2rpm The problem with doing any of this now is that the python guidelines are in significant flux and will hopefully emerge in a much cleaner state with various convenience macros to handle the bulk of the heavy lifting. - J< _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
