----- Original Message ----- > From: "Haïkel" <hgue...@fedoraproject.org> > To: "Fedora Python SIG" <python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Cc: "Alan Pevec" <ape...@gmail.com>, python-ow...@fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:16:43 AM > Subject: Re: macros.python2 requires update in F21+ > > Hi, > > Nobody answered, should I assume that everyone is ok with me pushing > Orion's patches in F21 and F22? > > Regards, > H. > > 2015-09-08 12:26 UTC+02:00, Haïkel <hgue...@fedoraproject.org>: > > Hi, > > > > Recently, we had a lot of issues with openstack packages due to python > > newer guidelines. > > To fix upgrade path for python2 modules, you had to obsolete previous > > python-xxx module. > > Orion committed a fix in rawhide in the macro %python_provides that > > fixes that issue. > > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python.git/commit/?id=7fdb9bedcda48894b7ba85e34ca5722b28b69076 > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python.git/commit/?id=cb9dd734593c52b84f0b9b6f19f352001c1d50d3 > > > > Could we backport these in F21/22/23 ? > > It's rather critical, as we have less experienced packagers pushing > > updates without checking > > the upgrade path or provides/obsoletes. Having a reliable > > %python_macros as in rawhide makes it more > > robust and will avoid breaking users dependencies > > > > I prefer that python maintainers do the update as it's a critical > > package, but I don't mind doing it in their stead > > if you approve this (if necessary) > > > > > > Regards, > > H. > > > Hi Haikel,
sorry for no response. LGTM (as a co-maintainer) -- Robert Kuska {rkuska} _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel