On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.bad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2015 6:06 AM, "Nick Coghlan" <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 17 November 2015 at 23:25, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > As for naming, I'm all ears for a better name, because if the "egg" >> > name is going away, I'd rather it not continue to say that. >> >> My suggestions would be either: >> >> python2dist(name)/python3dist(name) >> > I'd favor this form due to the import names conflict that Nick mentions (not > that I think anyone will code an auto generator that uses import names once > this is accepted.. this seems good enough to carry the day.) > > One thing I would change, though: instead of python2dist(name) use > python2.7dist(name). A module built for python 2.7 won't be able to import > a module built for python2.6 (the python interpreter won't look in the > directories in which the files are placed) so without both the major.minor > numbers we won't be able to rely on the auto generated requires in the spec > file. > > -Toshio
That's already guaranteed by the auto-generated python(abi) requires, and that would also make it hugely problematic to use in spec files in any distro agnostic manner, so I don't think I will do that. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
