On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 13.9.2016 19:27, Dhanesh Bhalchandra Sabane wrote: > >> Aloha Python-SIG! >> I was wondering whether it is a good time to make the new pages official. >> Also, I would like to know whether the idea of splitting the SIG into two >> FAS groups is acceptable so that we can start taking necessary actions. >> > Yes and yes. +1 > > CommOps is currently working on the Python SIG On-Boarding ticket [1] and >>> one of the tasks >>> we have identified is re-writing the Python SIG wiki page to make it more >>> beginner-friendly. I was assigned with this particular task which is now >>> complete [2] [3]. >>> We received some feedback from mhroncok today during the CommOps >>> meeting and following >>> points were discussed: >>> >>> 1. Splitting Python SIG in two FAS groups: >>> 1.1 *python-sig* for newcomers and interested members who hang out and >>> help with Python on >>> Fedora >>> 1.2 *python-packagers* for proven members of the community / packagers >>> who will also >>> receive security-related bugs. Promising members from *python-sig* group >>> can be promoted >>> to *python-packagers* given that they have contributed to the package's >>> git. >>> >>> This will make the intent much clearer :)
_______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
