On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:24 AM, jan matejek <jmate...@suse.cz> wrote: > On 10.11.2016 14:16, Neal Gompa wrote: >> As far as I know, openSUSE was the *only* distribution *not* doing >> single spec Python 2/3 packaging. Fedora[1] and Mageia[2] both do. > > and as far as I can tell, we're now the only ones to (try to) automate > this as opposed to writing everything in the spec file explicitly ;) > > Which, for instance, would allow us to support pypy across the board > with little additional effort. > > Maybe that's where pyp2rpm comes in at Fedora? Does it regenerate the > spec for every build? > > m. >
Yes. We also have it hooked up to our COPR service to autogenerate them fairly regularly[1][2][3] as a way to help make pyp2rpm even more useful and reliable. [1]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/copr/PyPi/ [2]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/copr/PyPI2/ [3]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/copr/PyPI3/ -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
