On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:25 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
<mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 15:16 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't really know who maintains `rpmdev-newspec python-foo` but
> > > the
> > > output
> > > (when I run this on Fedora 32) is really severely outdated beyond
> > > being any
> > > useful. I remember trying to update the template many years ago but
> > > got stuck at
> > > EPEL-compatibility issues.
> > >
> > Neal maintains rpmdevtools, both on src.fp.o and on Pagure
> >
> > I'll get a PR in to make the Python spec a bit more up to date. This
> > brings to mind that I've been intendeing to have a spec template and
> > a
> > packaging guideline for Lua for a while; that can go next.
> >
> So:
> F32 has rpmdevtools 8.10, which was first released... over three years
> ago
>
> * Sat Jan 14 2017 Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> - 8.10-1
>
> The spec in pagure is updated (including a patch Miro committed last
> year), but looks like it's only built for F33 and F34 right now.
>
> Neal, we should be able to release this for F32, right? Most packagers
> are likely to still be on it rather than on the recently branched F33
> so it probably would save some review time.
>

I am not releasing rpmdevtools 9.x to F32 or older because I've
changed default behaviors for 9.0 and replaced the spectool
implementation.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to