I have picked up the then orphaned csound on 2022-10-17 to fix its unrelated FTBFS issues, and the current csound-6.16.2-7 package successfully builds locally with your below build instructions which "rm -rf" distutils from the mock buildroot.
So the csound-6.16.2-7 package appears to be good to go for sans distutils builds (and BTW, csound.spec has been BuildRequiring python3-setuptools since at least 2019-08-19). I am therefore assuming the csound package landed on this list by mistake. Possibly csound was still FTBFS when you did your sans distutils build, and then I had just fixed csound to build successfully when you ran the control-group copr builds. -ndim On 2022-10-18 11:27 +0200, Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hey Pythonistas. > > The Python standard library distutils module will be removed from > Python 3.12+ > > https://peps.python.org/pep-0632/ > > As preparatory work, we build all python packages in a Copr > repository with Python 3.11 sans distutils: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python-without-distutils/ > > I've rebuilt all the failed builds again and also in a control-group > copr: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python-with-distutils/ > > 250 packages that failed to build without distuils but succeeded with > distutils need to be examined and categorized into various different > groups: > > - package uses distutils only if sys.version_info < (3, 12) > -- this is OK but still fails here > - package uses distutils unconditionally and the package needs to > be fixed > - package uses another package that uses distutils unconditionally > and the dependency needs to be fixed > > I suspect most of the packages will fail to build with Python 3.12 > (planned for Fedora 39, change proposal TBD). The python3-setutpools > package provides a distutils module [^1], so sometimes "simply" > adding BuildRequires: python3-setuptools might workaround the problem. > > However, upstream involvement is recommended. > > A few bugzillas were opened wrt this and I plan to open more: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=PYTHON3.12&hide_resolved=0 > > I've also oepned some upstream Pull Requests: > https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/11522 > https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/pull/3636 > https://pagure.io/fedora-gather-easyfix/pull-request/10 > https://github.com/filbranden/dnf-plugins-perfmetrics/pull/1 > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/deltarpm/pull/17 > > Could you please help me by looking at your failed packages and > talking to your upstreams? Feel free to reply with links, questions, > bugzillas... > > To test this locally, you can do something like: > > 1. fedpkg clone $PKG && cd $PKG > 2. mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 init > 3. mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 install python3-devel > 4. sudo rm -rf > /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/usr/lib64/python3.11/distutils/ > 4. fedpkg mockbuild -N > > > Thanks! > > ------------------------ > > [^1]: Unfortunately, is not 100 % compatible with the removed > standard library one distutils: > https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/3532 > > ------------------------ > > Maintainers by package: > [...] > csound ndim > [...] > > Packages by maintainer: > [...] > ndim csound > [...] _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
