On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 11:43:41 -0400, Neal Gompa via python-devel wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 11:41 AM Miro Hrončok via python-devel > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey Pythonistas, > > > > For a long time, I was considering whether we could have long options for > > pyproject RPM macros. > > > > E.g. %pyproject_save_files --assert-license > > > > I drafted something today using LLM and would like to know your opinions: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/pull-request/574 > > > > Obviously, having long options support is a benefit for readability of the > > spec > > files. However, is it worh it? All the argument processing now lives in a > > custom Lua code. > > > > Would you use this? > > I would. I hate short options for scripts and such.
+1 I'd prefer the long options in my specs too. It would really help, especially now that multiple people help out with packages via PRs. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
