On 8/13/26 2:06 PM, Miro Hrončok via python-devel wrote: > Consider this dependency: > > Requires-Dist: rich>=13; extra == "rich" > > What is `%pyproject_patch_dependency rich:ignore` supposed to do? > > It currently drops that entire line. Is that desired? Is it expected?
I think this behavior is desirable in certain circumstances (e.g., to package an "all" extra where only one of the optional dependencies is missing), but maybe the macro should require specifying both the name of the dependency and the name of the extra when making a change to a dependency of an extra. -- _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
