Hi folks,

I'm generating a weekly report of activity in the Fedora project centered on 
teams and SIGs, it's called "This Week in Fedora" 
<https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/twif/>. This generation uses an LLM. The 
goal is to make it easier to catch up with everything that's going on in the 
project, and to give visibility to each group's work and requests for help or 
testing. I think that from a newcomer's point of view, having an insight on 
what a group is working on at a point in time is helpful to decide whether it's 
interesting and worth contributing to.
I'm collecting activity from:
- this mailing-list
- discourse posts with the #python-sig tag

In the latest version, I've added the possiblity to gather messages exchanged 
in Matrix channels. The #python channel is public and its entire history is 
available to new members, but a quite a few people in mutiple Matrix channels 
were unhappy about the LLM collecting this info, for various reasons.
I would like to know whether this group is OK with my program collecting and 
submitting info to an LLM from the following sources:
1. mailing-lists and discourse posts
2. the matrix channel

I would like to make the case for source 2 (the Matrix channel) because I think 
it's less obvious: knowing the "tone" of a conversation and the currently 
discussed subjects before joining is very important to help contribute to it. 
It's like when you're added to an empty group chat and you don't know how to 
start. That's why we show history to new channel members, and this would be the 
same idea at a higher level. Plus there's actual work going on in there for a 
lot of groups.
That said, I recognize that the form of the tool influences its use, chat 
messages are usually less thought-through than emails or forum posts, and 
members could be indimidated that something they write there and regret end up 
in a visible summary (the program respects message edits, but anyway).
Since my goal is to foster participation, the one thing I don't want to do is 
to hinder it in another way.

I know I've asked this in the chat last week but someone in another room noted 
that people can easily miss Matrix messages, which it true.

Please decide which collected sources, if any, you are OK with (and if you work 
in other places that you would like to have collected, of course (I can do RSS 
feeds!)). If the group is OK with Matrix channel collection but some 
individuals aren't, I can also exclude certain Matrix usernames from collection 
throughout the Matrix channels that are not meetings.

I'm happy to answer questions if you have any. Thanks!
-- 
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
  • Collection of this group's d... Aurelien Bompard via python-devel

Reply via email to