On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In which case, something IS better than nothing. > > > I'm not arguing that we do nothing. Are you saying we should use > CP_UTF8 *in preference* to wide character APIs? Or that we should > implement CP_UTF8 first and then wide chars later? Honestly, I don't understand the details enough to argue either way. > Or are we in > violent agreement that we should implement wide chars? probably -- to the extend I understand the issues :-) But I am arguing that anything that makes it "better" that actually gets implemented is better than a "right" solution that no one has the time to make it happen, or that we can't agree on anyway. -CHB -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
