In short, a PEP is a summary of a long discussion. IMHO a PEP is required to write down the rationale and lists most important alternative and explain why the PEP is better.
The hard part is to write a short but "complete" PEP. I tried to follow this discussion and I still to understand why my proposition of "def clamp(min_val, value, max_val): return min(max(min_val, value), max_val)" is not good. I expect that a PEP replies to this question without to read the whole thread :-) I don't recall neither what was the "conclusion" for NaN. Victor Le 10 août 2016 00:43, "Chris Barker" <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> a écrit : > > Is this idea still alive? > > Despite the bike shedding, I think that some level of consensus may have been reached. So I suggest that either Neil (because it was your idea) or Steven (because you've had a lot of opinions, and done a lot of the homework) or both, of course, put together a reference implementation and a proposal, post it here, and see how it flies. > > It's one function, so hopefully won't need a PEP, but if your proposal meets with a lot of resistance, then you could turn it into a PEP then. But getting all this discussion summaries would be good as a first step. > > NOTE: I think it's a fine idea, but I've got way to omay other things I'd like to do first -- so I'm not going to push this forward... > > -CHB > > > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull < turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: >> >> Steven D'Aprano writes: >> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:30:35PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> > >> > > I can even think of a case where clamp could be used with a constant >> > > control and a varying bound: S-s inventory control facing occasional >> > > large orders in an otherwise continuous, stationary demand process. >> > >> > Sounds interesting. Is there a link to somewhere I could learn more >> > about this? >> >> The textbook I use is Nancy Stokey, The Economics of Inaction >> https://www.amazon.co.jp/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?__mk_ja_JP=%E3%82%AB%E3%82%BF%E3%82%AB%E3%83%8A&url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=nancy+stokey+economics+inaction >> >> The example I gave is not a textbook example, but is an "obvious" >> extension of the simplest textbook models. >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-ideas mailing list >> Python-ideas@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas >> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > > > > > -- > > Christopher Barker, Ph.D. > Oceanographer > > Emergency Response Division > NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice > 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax > Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception > > chris.bar...@noaa.gov > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
