Hi Sven,
On 2016-09-05 4:27 PM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
Hi Yury, just for my understanding: On 04.09.2016 01:31, Yury Selivanov wrote:We propose to allow the use of ``await`` expressions in both asynchronous and synchronous comprehensions:: result = [await fun() for fun in funcs] result = {await fun() for fun in funcs} result = {fun: await fun() for fun in funcs}This will produce normal lists, sets and dicts, right?
Right.
Whereas the following will produce some sort of async lists, sets, and dicts?result = [await fun() async for fun in funcs] result = {await fun() async for fun in funcs} result = {fun: await fun() async for fun in funcs}If so, how do I read values from an async list/set/dict?
Consider "funcs" to be an asynchronous generator/iterable that produces a sequence of awaitables. The above comprehensions will await on each awaitable in funcs, producing regular list, set, and dict.
I doubt that anybody ever would write something like that; this is just examples of what the PEP will enable.
There is no concept of asynchronous datastructures in Python. Thanks, Yury
Sven _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
