Are you serious? The reason for "we don't need standardization" ==
"there is a solution, long, and with a lot of special characters". Holy
c***. I remember Python being the least verbose language on the planet.
I suspect this argument didn't lead to status quo. It's like saying, we
don't need variable annotations because we have comments.
On 06.09.2016 20:25, אלעזר wrote:
Naive shuffled() can be emulated using a single expression:
sorted(lst, key=lambda _: random())
So there's even less incentive for standardization.
Besides being a silly argument, it's an interesting solution.
Does it really work? I remember Microsoft utilizing a similar approach
for their browser selection tool which led to a skewed probability
distribution. Maybe, I wrong here though.
Cheer,
Sven
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
