Ok, I guess it's time to end this thread. Thank you all for your answers
and the constructive discussion.
Best,
Dominik
On 12.09.2016 08:25, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 11 September 2016 at 19:36, Dominik Gresch <gres...@gmx.ch> wrote:
Hi,
I've recently found myself writing code similar to this:
for i in range(10):
if i == 5:
continue
"body"
which I find a bit ugly. Obviously the same could be written as
for i in range(10):
if i != 5:
"body"
but here you would have to look at the end of the body to see if something
happens when i==5.
So I asked myself if a syntax as follows would be possible:
for i in range(10) if i != 5:
body
Personally, I find this extremely intuitive since this kind of if-statement
is already present in list comprehensions.
What is your opinion on this? Sorry if this has been discussed before -- I
didn't find anything in the archives.
Generally speaking, we only add new syntax in cases where we're
prepared to say "In all cases where the new syntax applies, it should
be used in preference to existing alternative spellings".
Special casing a single "if-continue" in a loop body doesn't meet that
(deliberately high) bar, with Paul Moore's email going into some more
detail on the specifics of that.
Cheers,
Nick.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
