If at all, it should be function.bind(). It was discussed and dropped; I don't remember why, but one problem is that it looks like an in-place modification.
Personally I think that higher order programming should not be encouraged (as opposed to functional programming), and from the lambda syntax I understand it isn't. Elazar בתאריך יום ב׳, 19 בספט' 2016, 18:24, מאת Michel Desmoulin < desmoulinmic...@gmail.com>: > While lambda are a great tools that can do the job of partial, partial > is always a superior solution when trying to curry a Python function > because it's explicit and easier to debug. > > Having to import it everytime means I usually go for a lambda out of > lazyness, but also means that most people don't know about it. > > If think having it in the builtins would promote cleaner, faster code, > but would also facilitate and encourage coding patterns using curried > functions. > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
