On Wednesday, October 5, 2016, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 2016-10-05 2:50 PM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Michel Desmoulin < >> desmoulinmic...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> +1. Python does need better error messages. This and the recent new import >>> exception will really help. >>> >>> Will feature freeze prevent this to get into 3.6 if some champion it? >>> >>> Speaking of, I'm not much of a C hacker, and messing with CPython >> internals >> is a little daunting. If anyone wants to take this on, you have my >> blessing. I also may take a shot at implementing this idea in the next >> couple weeks when I have some time. >> > > It would help if you could create an issue and write exhaustive unittests > (or at least specifying how exactly the patch should work for all corner > cases). Someone with the knowledge of CPython internals will later add the > missing C code to the patch. Good idea. I will make an attempt at this later this week, starting with the tests that were added to pypy. For now I will focus on bound methods. > > Yury > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
