On 1 November 2016 at 10:11, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I do think it would be worth covering the symbol+keyword option > discussed in PEP 531 (i.e. "?else" instead of "??", but keeping "?.", > and "?[")
FWIW, I'm not keen on it. As a technical question, would it be treated in the syntax as a keyword, which happened to be made up of a punctuation character followed by letters, or as a ? symbol followed by a keyword? The difference would be in how "? else" was treated. If the space is not allowed, we have a unique situation in Python's grammar (where whitespace between a symbol and a keyword is explicitly disallowed rather than being optional). If it is allowed, I suspect a lot of people would prefer to write "? else" and aesthetically the two seem very different to me. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
