On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31 December 2016 at 05:53, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> On 12/30/2016 07:10 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >>> What module would be appropriate, though? >> >> Well, DynamicClassAttribute is kept in the types module, so that's >> probably the place to put optionalproperty as well. > > I'd also be OK with just leaving it as a builtin.
FWIW, I've felt for a while that the "types" module is becoming a catchall for stuff that would be more appropriate in a new "classtools" module (a la functools). I suppose that's what "types" has become, but I personally prefer the separate modules that make the distinction and would rather that "types" looked more like it does in 2.7. Perhaps this would be a good time to get that ball rolling or maybe it's just too late. I'd like to think it's the former, especially since I consider "classtools" a module that has room to grow. -eric _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
