On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 06:33:39PM +1300, Greg Ewing wrote: > Chris Angelico wrote: > >Which is why these proposals always seem to gravitate to "anything you > >can assign to", > > There might be some parsing difficulties with that, e.g. > > def foo(x)[5](y, z): > ... > > That should be acceptable, because foo(x)[5] is something > assignable, but foo(x) looks like the beginning of the > definition of a function called foo. I'm not sure whether > the parser would cope with that.
Forget the parser. I know *I* can't cope with that. *wink* -- Steve _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
