On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:31:19PM +0100, Mikhail V wrote: > I have said I need the index, probably you've misread my last comment. > Further more I explained why I think iteration over index should be the > preferred way, it help with readability a lot.
Your concept of readability is clearly radically different from that of the majority of the Python community. > All my learning years ended up with rewriting most code to "for i in > range()" How do you cope with generators and iterators that don't have a length? How do you cope with iterables which are infinite? > and I slap myself when I start to write "for e in L". > It is exactly where TOOWTDI applies perfectly and it is integer iteration > for me. It sounds like Python is not a good match for the way you think. I don't say that as a put-down, but perhaps you would be happier if you found another language that works the way you would like, instead of trying to force Python to be something it isn't? -- Steve _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
