My 2 cent's worth, don't even think about it. On Apr 15, 2017 3:27 AM, "Serhiy Storchaka" <storch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15.04.17 11:55, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > >> Serhiy Storchaka writes: >> >> > The first thread just sets the running flag (as in current code). Due >> to >> > GIL this doesn't need additional synchronization. >> >> Can we assume this lack of additional synchronization for other >> implementations? If not, do we care? >> > > Other implementations should have atomic test-and-set operations for the > running flag. Or other ways to prevent a race condition. So yes, we can > assume this. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
