Just as an aside, if a concatenation operator *was* included, a suitable operator would be "++", this is the concatenation operator in languages like Haskell (for strings) and the majority of Scala cases. Alternatively "<>" is an alternative, being the monoidal append operator in Haskell, which retains a certain similarly. I suggest these purely for their accepted usage, which means they should be more reasonable to identify.
Jamie On 30 Jun 2017 12:35 pm, "Victor Stinner" <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-06-30 1:33 GMT+02:00 Soni L. <fakedme...@gmail.com>: > > Step 3. add decimal concatenation operator for numbers: 2 cat 3 == 23, 22 > > cat 33 = 2233, etc. if you need bitwise concatenation, you're already in > > bitwise "hack" land so do it yourself. (no idea why bitwise is considered > > hacky as I use it all the time, but oh well) > > I *never* needed "2 cat 3 == 23". Strange operator :-) > > Victor > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
