IIRC in CPython 3.6 and PyPy dicts are ordered based on insertion anyway; although it's an implementation-specific detail, realistically it removes some of the use cases for ordered dictionary literals.
-- Ryan (ライアン) Yoko Shimomura, ryo (supercell/EGOIST), Hiroyuki Sawano >> everyone elsehttp://refi64.com On Sep 7, 2017 at 6:40 AM, <Matteo Nastasi <nast...@alternativeoutput.it>> wrote: Hi all, few days ago I thought about a way to rapresent sets and ordered dicts using a json compatible syntax, these are my conclusions: A set could be defined as { item1, item2, item3[...] } with {,} as an empty set An ordered dict could be defined as [ item1: value1, item2: value2 ... ] with [:] ase an empty odered dict It could be used inside python code or to serialize python structures in a json-like format (pyson maybe ?). What do you think about ? Kind regards, Matteo. -- email: nast...@alternativeoutput.it, matteo.nast...@gmail.com web: www.alternativeoutput.it irc: #linux...@irc.freenode.net linkedin: http://lnkd.in/SPQG87 _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/