Thanks, Nick! I'll let this sink in today and give it a shot tomorrow.
Have a great weekend, --diana > * Switch to your suggested "set-of-strings" API at the Python level, > with the Python level integer interface retained only for backwards > compatibility > * Keep the current integer-based *C* optimization API, but redefine > the way that value is interpreted, rather than passing Python sets > around > > The Python APIs would then convert the Python level sets to the > bitfield representation almost immediately for internal use, but you > wouldn't need to mess about with the bitfield yourself when calling > the Python APIs. > > The difference I see relates to the fact that in Python: > > * sets of strings are easier to work with than integer bitfields > * adding a new keyword-only argument to existing APIs is straightforward > > While in C: > > * integer bitfields are easier to work with than Python sets of Python strings > * supporting a new argument would mean defining a whole new parallel set of > APIs _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/