Sorry, that's an in-joke. Koos is expressing his disappointment in the rejection of PEP 555 in a way that's only obvious if you're Dutch.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 08:04:25PM +0300, Koos Zevenhoven wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> > wrote: > > > > > I'd like to have time.time_ns() -- this is most parallel to > st_mtime_ns. > > > > > > > > Welcome to the list Guido! You sound like a C programmer. For many > people, > > that was the best language they knew of when they learned to program. But > > have you ever tried Python? You should give it a try! > > You seem to be making a joke, but I have *no idea* what the joke is. > > Are you making fun of Guido's choice of preferred name? "time_ns" > instead of "time_nanoseconds" perhaps? > > Other than that, I cannot imagine what the joke is about. Sorry for > being so slow. > > > -- > Steve > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/