Hi francis, Le 20 oct. 2017 18:42, "francismb" <franci...@email.de> a écrit :
Hi Victor, On 10/13/2017 04:12 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > I would like to add: > > * time.time_ns() > * time.monotonic_ns() > * time.perf_counter_ns() > * time.clock_gettime_ns() > * time.clock_settime_ns() due nano vs. pico vs. ... why not something like (please change '_in' for what you like): time.time_in(precision) time.monotonic_in(precision) If you are not aware yet, I wrote a full PEP: PEP 564. The two discussed idea are alreafy listed in the PEP, configurable precision and sub-nanosecond resolution. I tried to explain why I proposed time.time_ns() in detail in the PEP: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0564/#sub-nanosecond-resolution You may want to join the discussion on python-dev. Victor
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
