On 28 November 2017 at 16:11, Stephen J. Turnbull
<turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
> > The subset of iterators which are created as generators are *also*
> > called generators,
>
> As long as we're being precise, I don't think that is precisely correct:
>
> >>> (x for x in range(1))
> <generator object <genexpr> at 0x10dee5e08>
> >>> iter(range(1))
> <range_iterator object at 0x10dab83f0>
> >>> iter((1,))
> <tuple_iterator object at 0x10df109b0>
>
> The two iterators have the same duck-type, the generator is different.
> A generator (object) is, of course, an interable.
While it's not obvious with the genexp (since they're anonymous), the
main reason for the difference in the repr layouts here is just
because generator iterators can have names:
>>> def g(): yield
...
>>> g()
<generator object g at 0x7f93e5e41258>
So the statement that "generator iterators are iterators" is correct.
The functions that create them are called generator functions because
they really are functions:
>>> g
<function g at 0x7f93f17f1ea0>
What's more unfortunate here is that the usage of "generator" in the
generator-iterator representation doesn't actually align with the
preferred terminology in the documentation:
https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-generator
So I can understand the confusion here.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
