On 29 November 2017 at 18:49, Kirill Balunov <kirillbalu...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-11-29 11:14 GMT+03:00 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>: >> >> It's OK to say "the use case exists, but I still >> don't want that particular syntax for it in Python" (I'm personally >> inclined to agree with you on that front). It's not OK to try to claim >> there are no use cases where the status quo is awkward enough to >> become irritating (since it's an empirically false statement that you >> don't need to be making). > > If the problem with the proposed syntax, but there are cases for use, it may > be worth to bikeshed one more time?
I don't think enough time has passed since we first discussed it. Since Guido has already said "not for 3.7", we can give folks another 12+ months to ponder the problem, and then maybe revisit it for 3.8. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
