On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...] The implicit functions used in the
> comprehension & generator expression cases are just potentially
> simpler to handle, as we don't care about their API signatures, which
> means we can freely pollute their APIs with eager name bindings if we
> choose to do so. [...]
>
Hm, so maybe we shouldn't touch lambda, but we can at least fix the scope
issues for comprehensions and genexprs.
There may still be breakage, when the code defines a global x that is
overridden by a class-level x, and a class-level comprehension references x
assuming it to be the global. So we need to tread carefully even here --
but this case is weird already:
x = 42
class C:
x = [1, 2, 3]
z = [x+y for y in x] # [43, 44, 45]
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
