Le 02/04/2018 à 07:09, Mike Miller a écrit : > > On 2018-04-01 05:36, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> You are right that many of the prefixes can be handled by the same code: >> >> rfd rfD rFd rFD rdf rdF rDf rDF >> Rfd RfD RFd RFD Rdf RdF RDf RDF >> frd frD fRd fRD fdr fdR fDr fDR >> Frd FrD FRd FRD Fdr FdR FDr FDR >> drf drF dRf dRF dfr dfR dFr dFR >> Drf DrF DRf DRF Dfr DfR DFr DFR >> # why did we support all these combinations? who uses them? > > In almost twenty years of using Python, I've not seen capital string > prefixes in real code, ever. Sounds like a great candidate for > deprecation?
+1 It's not like migrating would be hard: a replace is enough to fix the rare projects doing that. And even if they missed the warning, it's a syntax error anyway, so you will get the error as soon as you try to run the program, not at a later point at runtime. What about doing a poll, then suggests a warning on 3.8, removed in 4.0 ? _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
