> Hey! I did not propose "?". Read the explanation in parenthesis. > My whole idea that any option could be viable, as long as > it does not propose reversed order notation.
Dear Mikhail, so sorry about my misunderstanding, I should read the post with fewer presuppositions... Back to the topic, this thread seems to be closed now, and in my opinion `:=` could be synthetically the best. 2018-04-17 15:11 GMT+08:00 Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:09 AM, Thautwarm Zhao <yaoxiansa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > 3) "target ? expr" (where ? is some other word/character - IIRC > > > "target from expr" was proposed once) > > > > A more popular convention is to mark `?` as handling boolean variables, > so > > `target ? expr` could mean `expr if target else target`. Other proposal > for > > null/boolean checking might need `?`, let's preserve `?` character for > > further development. > > Hey! I did not propose "?". Read the explanation in parenthesis. > My whole idea that any option could be viable, as long as > it does not propose reversed order notation. > > But anyway ":=" is better than any keyword imo. > > > Mikhail >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
