I still think that 'operator.subscript' would be valuable to me for all of the same reasons discussed in the previous threads and issues. I don't understand why it was reverted without any serious discussion given that it was already accepted and many people find this useful.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote: > 23.07.18 18:16, Guido van Rossum пише: >> >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be >> <mailto:j.deme...@ugent.be>> wrote: >> >> On 2018-07-23 11:58, Grégory Lielens wrote: >> >> Not sure slice[1::3] can be done >> >> >> It can be done. Since "slice" is a class, it would require a >> metaclass though. >> >> >> Since PEP 560 it won't need a metaclass -- it can be implemented as >> __class_getitem__. > > > Do you bless using __class_getitem__ for something other than typing? > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
