On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:17 AM David Mertz <me...@gnosis.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:00 AM Nicholas Chammas < > nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Forgive me for being slow. I'm missing what's different in semantics >> between the translation above and Chris's translation below: >> > > You are VERY close now. You have more SPAM, so yours is better: > <snipped> Understood. Thanks for clarifying. I think Chris was referring to this in an earlier message (when I made my first attempt at translating) when he said: > Aside from questions of repeated evaluation/assignment, yes. The broad > semantics should be the same. So the meaning of my translation matches the "intention" of the original PEP 505 expression, but I see the danger in offering up such loose translations. Getting the meaning right but missing important details (like repeated evaluation) does not inspire confidence.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
