On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:13 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: > Michael Selik writes: > > > However, PEP 1 does not give instruction on how to evaluate whether > > that discussion has been completed satisfactorily. > > That's because completion of discussion has never been a requirement > for writing a PEP.
Not for drafting, but for submitting. For my own PEP submission, I received the specific feedback that it needed a "proper title" before being assigned a PEP number. My goal for submitting the draft was to receive a PEP number to avoid the awkwardness of discussing a PEP without an obvious title. Perhaps PEP 1 should be revised to clarify the expectations for PEP submission. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
