On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Franklin? Lee wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 10:52 AM Elazar <elaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 16:56 Philipp A. <flying-sh...@web.de> wrote: > >> > >> The main clause differentiating bad, weaponizable CoCs from good ones is > >> > >> "Assume good faith" > >> > >> Everything will be OK if good faith can reasonably be assumed (E.g. when > >> someone uses a word which is only offensive based on context) > >> On the other hand, e.g. obvious racial slurs never have a place on a > >> discussion board about a programming language. How can one possibly say > >> them in good faith? > > > > > > Here's how: as a demonstration that words that are considered slurs in > > certain contexts (such as the word "Negro" in America) might be considered > > perfectly legitimate day-to-day words in another context. Even if the > > example was incorrect, it is still legitimate. > > I didn't report him, and I don't agree with the ban, but I assume I'm > missing something if they felt the need to act so strongly, days after > the discussion died down.
Hi folks, we have a committee-based process for making these decisions, so it necessarily takes some time. Brett and I can make urgent decisions but everything goes through the process. best, --titus _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
