> Ah, yes. Thank you. So it works in CPython 2.7. But I'm curious, does it work > in very old versions?
My bet is still on. I take paypay. I will not accept python 1 let's say. It's just easier that way. If **kwargs exists they take strings. > I'm not saying that this is important, because language changes always are > for new versions. However, Anders' claim that this not a language change > seemed too broad to me. Not what I meant. I meant it's not a change to any python implementation. It might be a change to promote an implementation detail to the spec as pointed out by Chris. > It may be that this change has very little cost, but it should not be > dismissed. I wasn't dismissing it. I just didn't think it was yet time to bring it up. We were still discussing larger themes. But if we do have to bring it up: It has zero technical cost in actuality right now but might not in the future have zero cost. It's the same argument against the guaranteed order of dicts in 3.7: it might have a cost in the future. / Anders _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
