On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 4:40 AM Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> I'm sure that Python will never be as efficient as C in that regard > (although PyPy might argue the point) but is there something we can do > to ameliorate this? If we could make char-by-char processing only 10 > times less efficient than C instead of 100 times (let's say...) perhaps > that would help Ram (and you?) with your use-cases? > > Does that mean I'll have to write that character-by-character algorithm? I could already do that now I guess, the speed doesn't matter for my use case, but I'm trying to avoid writing an algorithm.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/