Oooh, PEP463, you're reason with I switch to LBYL or write studpid try except functions so much times.
Oh and also the local assignement "let/where/statement" :D x = (y+1 where y = 3.14) because x = [y+1 for y in [3.14]][0] is an overkill and ugly. Should I write a PEP even though I know it's going to be rejected because the mailing list was not really into it ? Le mer. 31 oct. 2018 à 18:37, Michael Selik <m...@selik.org> a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:17 AM Eric Fahlgren <ericfahlg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 2:42 AM Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0463/ wants to say hi. >>> >> >> That was exactly my reaction, too, and usually is whenever one of these >> "add a default" or similar ideas pops up. 463 should be re-examined, I was >> very hopeful when it went through the wringer the first time, but alas it >> was not to be. >> > > I'll add my vote to re-examining PEP 463. > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/