Abe Dillon <abedil...@gmail.com> writes:
> A better way to list arguments is only one indentation level above the
> current:
>
> variable = some_class.method(
> argument=value,
> argument2=value)
>
> Trying to match the indentation of the opening line is less readable and
> less robust to refactoring:
>
> variable = some_class.method(argument=value,
> argument2=value)
>
> var = cls.method(argument=value,
> argument2=value)
Yes, that's unfortunate, but I still prefer the latter, and usually I accept
the hassle and realign the remaining lines.
In hindsight, I wish someone with a powerful time machine could introduce the
concept of "one-indent-level-and-half" for continuation lines: the statement
that most annoys me is the "if" when the condition is very long, because my
eyes suffer when I see the following:
if condition1 and \
condition2 and \
condition3:
do_something()
or even
if (condition1 and
condition2 and
condition3):
do_something()
at the point that I usually use a double paren just to have one single space
of difference between the continued condition elements and the succeeding
suite:
if ((condition1
and condition2
and condition3)):
do_something()
ciao, lele.
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
l...@metapensiero.it | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
