I would just file a bug and add a PR. On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:14 PM Matěj Cepl <mc...@cepl.eu> wrote:
> Hi, > > I am a lead maintainer of Python packages in OpenSUSE and I can > see the pattern of many packagers adding blindly > > python setup.py test > > to %check section of our SPEC file. The problem is that if the > package doesn't use unittest (it actually uses nose, pytest or > something), it could lead to zero found tests, which pass and > Python returns exit code 0 (success) even though nothing has been > tested. It seems from the outside that everything is all right, > package is being tested on every build, but actually it is lie. > > Would it be possible to change unittest runner, so that when 0 > tests pass, whole test suite would end up failing? > > Thank you for considering this, > > Matěj > > -- > https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz > GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 > > Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by > stupidity. > -- Napoleon Bonaparte (or many other people to whom this > quote is ascribed) > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/