29.03.19 20:52, Brett Cannon пише:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:53 AM Serhiy Storchaka
<storch...@gmail.com
<mailto:storch...@gmail.com>> wrote:
28.03.19 19:45, Brett Cannon пише:
> So I would say that a cache-clearing function convention would be a
> reasonable starting point. If that turns out to not be enough for
folks
> we can talk about expanding it, but I think we should start small
and
> grow from there as needed.
>
> So what name would people want. clear_cache() or _clear_cache()? I
> personally prefer the latter since clearing the cache shouldn't be
> something people should typically need to do and thus the
function is an
> implementation detail.
This is an interesting idea. I think it should be a dunder name:
__clearcache__() or __clear_cache__().
Between those two then I would go with __clearcache__(), but I was
talking about a naming scheme for a function in each module, not a new
built-in in case you thought I meant that.
Then I understood you correctly. Only now I saw that your words could
have been understood differently.
Opened https://bugs.python.org/issue36485 for implementing this idea.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
