On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:49 AM Ricky Teachey <ri...@teachey.org> wrote: > > Can I offer an alternative suggestion? > > How about these arrow operators, which despite being 3 characters, look > pretty nice, and are not currently valid python: > > a <== b <== c > a ==> b ==> c > > Perhaps __larrow__ and __rarrow__ for the dunders. > > And they would not be the only 3 character operators in python: > > //=, **=, >>=, <<=
I wouldn't mind one more char to type ... as long as it looks good. My preference order is: = (almost impossible), := (taken already ...), <-/<= (conflicts existing code and breaks bad coding styles). Looks like in the short term there is not really many choice left. I like it, definitely better than signal.next ... and still looks like verilog <= assignment. Is this (<== and ==>) something can be made into CPython? _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
