On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:37:48PM -0700, Andrew Barnert wrote:

> Since you bring up “feeble mail clients”: 
> 
> Good mail clients can be configured to collapse and expand quotes, and 
> to automatically start long nested quotes collapsed. 

Indeed you are correct, and my own mail client supports that as an 
optional add-on, which I've tried and discarded as more annoying than 
helpful. In my experience the problem is that trying to solve the 
problem of quoting via technology is too crude: all the ones I've see 
are all or nothing, hide all context or show all context.

Its really a *human* problem, not a technology problem: as the reader, I 
want to see *relevant* context, but not the entire history of the 
discussion. I cannot see any automated tool being able to guess what is 
relevant any time soon.


> In fact, most 
> feeble clients (like Gmail and Yahoo, and the builtin iOS and Android 
> apps) do this whether you want it or not.

I can't speak for the others, but my recollection of Gmail is that 
replies default to top posting with the quoted text below your response.


[...]
> But you’re not going to convince everyone to do it traditionally all 
> the time

I'm not trying to do that. But surely it's not too hard to ask that 
every few posts somebody in the thread trims quoting to keep it under 
control?

I'm not bitching because somebody quoted seven lines rather than three, 
I'm pointing out that when you have something like five pages of 
quoted text to a paragraph or three of new text, quoting is out of 
control. If we can't keep the quoting short in every post, we can hopely 
cull some of it periodically.

We're programmers. We've learned by hard experience to delete dead code, 
not to leave it sitting in the program commented out, and not just 
because it makes reading the source code harder. It makes it harder to 
search, it makes files and diffs larger, it increases the ratio of noise 
to signal. Excessive quoting in email is the same, whether your mail 
client hides it by default or not, the noise is still there.


> And the one-time hassle of figuring out how to configure your MUA, or 
> even switching to a better one

"Better" is subjective, and just because a client is arguably better 
in one regard doesn't make it better in others.



-- 
Steven
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/XYJNO5F6BAKGUHGNKMIAGE7ZSK5NXC47/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to